“ m’ont pas satisfait absolument. Vous jugerés si j’ai eu tors dans ce dernier article; mais je vous récuserai pour le premier.
Dittes moi du bien de vos compatriotes, je le croirai. Mais ne me dittes pas de mal de vous, car je ne le croirai pas . .
.”
Jefferson sent his remarks on September 2, 1785: “
You were so kind as to allow me a fortnight to read your journey through Virginia. but you should have thought of this indulgence
while you were writing it, and have rendered it less interesting if you meant that your readers should have been longer engaged
with it. in fact I devoured it at a single meal, and a second reading scarce allowed me sang froid enough to mark a few errors
in the names of persons and places which I note on a paper herein inclosed, with an inconsiderable error or two in facts which
I have also noted because I supposed you wished to state them correctly. from this general approbation however you must allow
me to except about a dozen pages in the earlier part of the book which I read with a continued blush from beginning to end,
as it presented me a lively picture of what I wish to be, but am not. no, my dear Sir, the thousand millionth part of what
you there say, is more than I deserve. it might perhaps have passed in Europe at the time you wrote it, and the exaggeration
might not have been detected. but consider that the animal is now brought there, & that every one will take his dimensions
for himself. the friendly complexion of your mind has betrayed you into a partiality of which the European spectator will
be divested. respect to yourself therefore will require indispensably that you expunge the whole of those pages except your
own judicious observations interspersed among them on Animal & physical subjects. with respect to my countrymen there is surely
nothing which can render them uneasy, in the observations made on them. they know that they are not perfect, and will be sensible
that you have viewed them with a philanthropic eye. you say much good of them, and less ill than they are conscious may be
said with truth. I have studied their character with attention. I have thought them, as you found them, aristocratical, pompous,
clannish, indolent, hospitable, & I should have added, disinterested, but you say attached to their interest. this is the
only trait in their character wherein our observations differ. I have always thought them so careless of their interests,
so thoughtless in their expences and in all their transactions of business that I had placed it among the vices of their character,
as indeed most virtues when carried beyond certain bounds degenerate into vices. I had even ascribed this to it’s cause, to
that warmth of their climate which unnerves and unmans both body & mind. while on this subject I will give you my idea of
the characters of the several states.
In the North they are |
In the South they are |
cool |
fiery |
sober |
voluptuary |
laborious |
indolent |
persevering |
unsteady |
independent |
independent |
jealous of their own liberties, & just to those of others |
zealous for their own liberties, but trampling on those of others |
interested |
generous |
chicaning |
candid |
superstitous & hypocritical in their religion |
without attachment or pretensions to any religion but that of the heart. |
these characteristics grow weaker and weaker by gradation from North to South & South to North, insomuch that an observing
traveller, without the aid of the quadrant may always know his latitude by the character of the people among whom he finds
himself. it is in Pennsylvania that the two characters seem to meet & blend, & to form a people free from the extremes both
of vice & virtue. peculiar circumstances have given to New York the character which climate would have given had she been
placed on the South instead of the North side of Pennsylvania. perhaps too other circumstances may have occasioned in Virginia
a transplantation of a particular vice foreign to it’s climate. you could judge of this with more impartiality than I could,
and the probability is that your estimate of them is the most just. I think it for their good that the vices of their character
should be pointed out to them that they may amend them; for a malady of either body or mind once known is half cured. I wish
you would add to this peice your letter to m
(
~
r)
Madison on the expediency of introducing the arts into America. I found in that a great deal of matter, ”