II. Rom. Imp. Avg. Omnia elegantibus figuris in
aes incisis expressa à Theodoro de Bry Leod. cive
Franc. A
o.
cIɔ Iɔ xcv. Cum privilegio S.
C. Maiestatis. [1595.]
68 leaves, engraved title within an engraved
historiated pictorial border, engraved portrait of Columbus, engraved double
page map of Mexico, engraved title before the plates, 22 numbered plates.
John
Carter Brown 402.
Church 156.
This part contains a continuation
of Chauveton’s translation of Benzoni’s
Historia, begun in Part
IV.
Relative to the engraved portrait of
Columbus found in this part, Jefferson wrote on August 9, 1814, to Joseph
Delaplaine, at work on his
Repository
of the Lives and Portraits of Distinguished American Characters
:
“
Your favor of July 28 is
just recieved, and I now inclose you the print of Vespucius, which I have cut
out of the book, & which is taken from the same original in the gallery of
Florence from which my painting was taken . . . Between the 4
th. & 5
th. parts of the great work of De
Bry. is a print of Columbus, and an account of it which should give it some
authority. it is very small, and not very much resembling my copy of his
portrait from the Florentine gallery. De Bry’s book is very rare and very
expensive. yet probably it may be in some of the libraries of Philadelphia,
perhaps the Loganian. if not, m
(
~
r)
Wood,
if he comes on to copy my Columbus, may copy this print also from my Debry.
both may be worth inserting in your work. DeBry says his was given to him by
the painter who drew the portrait of Columbus . . .
”
Delaplaine replied from Philadelphia on August 17:
“. . . At your suggestion I enquired at the Loganian & other libraries for
the work of De Bry, but in vain. In speaking to my worthy friend D
r. Barton on the subject, he
informed me that he believed the work was not in America except in your
possession. He spoke of its great value, and I at the same time mentioned that
it contained an engraved portrait of Columbus, and that De Bry says it was
given to him by the painter who drew the portrait of Columbus. That I derived
this information from you & added further, that an account of the print
accompanied it which should give it some authority . . .”
To this Jefferson replied on August 28: “
. . . I have taken from the 2
d. vol. of De Bry a rough model
of the leaf on which is the print he has given of Columbus, and his preface. it
gives the exact size and outline of the print, which, with a part of the
preface, is on the 1
st.
page of the leaf, and the rest on the 2
d. I have extracted from it what related to the
print, which you will percieve could not be cut out without a great mutilation
of the book. this would not be regarded as to it’s cost, which was 12. guineas
for the 3. vols in Amsterdam, but that it seems to be the only copy of the work
in the US. and I know from experience the difficulty if not impossibility of
getting another. I had orders lodged with several eminent booksellers, in the
principal book-marts of Europe, to wit, London, Paris, Amsterdam, Frankfort,
Madrid, several years before this copy was obtained at the accidental sale of
an old library in Amsterdam, on the death of it’s proprietor . .
.
”
Jefferson then compared the three
likenesses of Columbus from which Delaplaine was to make his choice, namely:
“
1. the print in Muñoz’ work, from a
copy of Rincon’s original, taken in the 17
th. century by an indifferent hand, with
conjectural alterations suggested by the verbal description of the young
Columbus of the countenance of his father.
[The work of Muñoz was described to Jefferson, from
the copy in Barton’s library, by Delaplaine in his letter of August 17.]
"
2. the
Miniature of De Bry, from a copy taken in the 16
th. century from the portrait maid by order of the
K. & Queen, probably that of Rincon.
"
3. the
copy in my possession, of the size of the life, taken for me from the original
which is in the gallery of Florence. I say, from an original, because it is
well known that in collections of any note, & that of Florence is the first
in the world,
no copy
is ever admitted; and an original existing in Genoa would
readily be obtained for a royal collection in Florence. Vasari, in his lives of
the painters, names this portrait in his catalogue of the paintings in that
gallery, but does not say by whom it was made. it has the aspect of a man of
35. still smooth-faced, & in the vigor of life, which would place
”